Adding my complaints                                                  

    I AM A NEW PAGE PLEASE BE PATIENT.

 I HAVE A LONG LIST .  I am still awaiting  all the information under the freedom of information which I should have recieved when I first asked for this in March 2013.

 

  Your dammed if you do and dammed if you don't. Kelly Cottam quote.

 

DC  Jaswinderpal Kohli -Barking Police-But now in Barkingside Police Station- He is(CAIT) Child Abuse Investigation Team.

He stole my sons very expensive computer which was specially made. He said it had illegal images of children. I went to the police station to be arrested.I was lucky to have a criminal solicitor from Edward Hayes supporting me. 

 They wouldn't show  the evidence in court as they should have done. These where beautiful pictures and no way indecent.  

When Police Commisioner Sir Bernard Hogan- Howe

 

 

 

 

 viewed the images I later found out he  dropped the alligations against me. My family member and friends within the police force would have refuted these alligations as they were beautiful pictures of their family and friends. Once the alligations were dropped I went to collect my contents  the Metropolitan police took from my property. DC Kohli said no I cannot have the computer back as they still have illegal images on it. I said no they do not.. I never saw any illegal images and neither did the retired officer.  I  asked DC Kohli infront of my criminal solicitor at the time  to see the few second clip they said was illegal but even asking three times he said it wouldn't be appropriate. 

 

I told DC Kohli  he's a liar and he's just destroying the evidence I would of had against him arresting me over these images...pictures that he saw as indecent. He or they tried to deem me as some kind of female nonce so obviously I need this to be noted.

 I made my compaints but as you read the IPCC Independent Police Complaints commision reported my  complaints they sent  his work mate Detective Inspector Kevin Jeffrey rank-  Detective Inspector- Sexual Offences, Exploitation and Child Abuse Command.

 

DC Kohi also secretly interviewed a  friend a highly respected officer who also stated the images where no way indecent... The ones that he saw.

He would also be backed by his many friends within the force.

DC Kohli also had a secret 2hour interview with the retired police officer  but this was hidden from the courts and it was not mentioned by anyone but this would have been  evidence to support me. But instead I had this stigma of having indencent images on my son's computer  to the final hearing. I even mentioned this on my asking for leave to appeal but even Lord Briggs eradicated this from the transcript which I will add the contents of all my court documents.  

 

I complained the case had not been dealt with properly. Brushed under the carpet by the officers involved and other members.

 

 I made the complaints to DI Jefferies and many others but  he filed my complaints but not being accurate or in the right context. I will add his letter and my complaints  here..........................

 

There was no documents signed by the Police Comissioner to state that he has dropped all alligations against me. Also not that has been shown within the court proceedings to show the local authorities that the comissioner had dropped all charges against me. And so the local authority used this against me and the courts to the final hearing.

 Being nearly branded a nonce by his fellow DC Jaswinerpal Kohli there should be a letter of apology. This certainly did not happen. Another disgraceful act within a police force.

 

I had different court case numbers: U013C00022- UO1300022- UO13C000022 and many others....

 

• Jean Kanzara the social worker assured the court that proof of the risk assessment in respect of me would be seen in her recorded case notes. There was not a single recording of any work done. The implications of it i.e., misleading evidence had been given that I had actually been properly risk assessed when in fact I had not.

The expert Dr Mograby's written statement when properly analyzed in fact confirmed that I am able to look after my children and that this would be their ideal placement if I was ( still awaiting the freedom of information since asking first in March 2013.

given the opportunity of demonstrating this he was not provided with home education reports of my children’s back ground.  

• Material was brought into the care proceedings by the local authority that there was no opportunity to properly deal with the serious documents. I was not provided with.

• My children items stolen in the care of social worker Jean Kanzara my son’s Samsung Galley, and my daughters brand new I Pod Nanno which was handed to the social worker Jean Kanzara at the time and not returned to this day. No record has been shown.

• Of great concern to me is the 130 page document that the local authority were to provide to demonstrate that work had been done to assess my daughter Mia's risk, while there was no evidence of risk assessment, there was reference to Guy telling his first foster carer had told him that his “father was a paedophile” and that I was unable to protect him and that this was the reason he was in care.   The social worker failed to refer this matter to either Guardian thereby preventing any investigation as to whether the 2nd foster carer did make this remark to Guy.

• The social worker said that the IRO Officer Kate Shepherd had investigated the matter and there was a proper explanation. However there was no evidence that was put before the Court or these documents were not given to me.

• The local authority failed to provide Dr Omer Moghraby with my children’ s home education reports that I gave to the local authority reports  to get a better background of my children’s home  education. These documents were not provided to Dr Omer Moghraby as he mentioned in his reports of not knowing the children’s educational background.

This had serious effects.

 

• Regarding my rent arrears this was due to some bureaucratic move by the local council to stop my housing benefit because they said I had been out of the country more than 14 weeks. Up until this time I had always paid my rent. But the reports stating that Ms Pow was evicted from her accommodation if they children were returned to their mother the ‘children’s well-being would be at risk’ was written by Jean Kanzara.the social worker, the guardian Titi Akinwande, and agreed by Ann Haigh the liberal democrat from Essex who was appointed by the court a few weeks before the final hearing.

• An important point that the threshold of danger had not be proven and neither child had complained of physical or sexual abuse at the time Guy and Mia were placed in care and the social services were acting beyond their remit in issuing a care order and therefore the forcible police removal was illegal.

• Enuresis was also made serious by the social workers reports but Mia stopped wearing nappies when she was 1 years of age and has never had a problem since except the first night in care. The social workers reports stated that I have not taking my daughter to the doctors when needed.

When fact is I did when looking at the doctors and nurses reports but this was not shown in the evidence.

• ‘During the police interview neither children made any disclosure and therefore an achieving best evidence interview was not progressed, was in the police reports, ‘but still  It seems that the local authority took the hearsay of anonymous informer throughout the whole case.

• Ingrid Doheny lied in her report and said ‘Mother is fully aware of Guy’s access to the inappropriate books and websites. 

‘I did not say this on a discussion on the 6th of February 2013’. This was a lie told by Ingrid Doheny the 1st social worker. Already Ingrid has been caught out on changing the words of my children. I have the reports.

 

• Inadequate note taking by the social workers.

(n) My whole case depended on absolute accuracy and reporting by social workers because my children’s welfare and future happiness with their much loved parents. Accurate recording is of the utmost importance in establishing the truth.

 

(o)  If the record taking was not as it should have said Judge Anthony Ansell. That is an admission that these records cannot be relied upon for accuracy. .

 

(q) 1st Social Worker Ingrid Doheny did have concern that Mia in particular ‘could’ suffer sexual harm. 

The social worker was implying that my partner Michael was an incestuous paedophile without proof or evidence.

my children’s “wishing” to be reunited with their mother and father as soon as possible and that was the expression that was being used on several occasions was not written by the social workers or guardian in the right context My children’s human right to have their voices heard. This was not done.

 

(r) The judge also admitted that social workers reports “were not as good as they might have been” and that records were “not kept” .

The evidence heard in this case is misleading, unsafe and unsatisfactory. This was also stated by my aid at the time my  Barrister at the time.

 

(s) False evidence was being manufactured without any CCTV recording. I was threatened that unless I dropped all court appearances for ICOs that I would be seen as a trouble maker and my visits to Guy and Mia may be stopped so I gave in and withdrew my application and understood not to make anymore.

 

(t) The social workers says that the children were “doing well at school” when I know from Mia and Guy’s contact meetings that the bullying, punching and slapping that they endured came from the stigma of being in care were not being told in these reports.  I had to call my children’s school and complain about this. The social worker did not provide following up these complaints. Bullying is a serious matter especially for my children who are suffering being alienated from their family AND IN AN ALREADY TRAUMATISED STATE OF MIND.

 

(u) False information given by Jean Kanzara the social worker who accused me of secretly giving my son a mobile phone under the table during a contact session. She was not there.  But I did give the phone to my son openly as he asked me during the contact for his phone on our contact meeting. I believe this was also written by the contact worker at Lakmini contact centre Allison Lodge. This would be evidence in my favour.

The contact centre is now closing down on 16th August 2014. It was the home of lakmini head social worker at Seven Sisters in London. Allison lodge was a very busy place where parents met up with their children on a regular basis.

 

(v) Ingrid Doheny my children’s first social worker said that mother didn’t mind Guy reading his father’s books to explore his sexuality.

This was a lie and I did not say this in during any meeting.

 

• I have complaints of 1ST  guardian Titi Akinwande inaccurate reporting also finished official documents were not signed or dated.

Titi Akinwande say’s in her reports that the assessments were progressing well when infarct they were not.

• Titi in her report says that Ms Pow’s position is complicated by fact that she is homeless and that she is subject to ongoing police investigation as to illegal images of children on a lap top.  Titi also wonders how Ms Pow can seek the return of her children in any event.

• All the allegations were dropped by the police commissioner Sir Bernard Hogan- Howe but the social workers did not put this in their reports and this was used against me throughout the hearings. These allegations were dropped in the   middle  of July 2013.

• I was also made homeless unfairly. This was not considered when I gave good reasons to the  social workers at the time.

The reporters who I believed to be social workers as there was so many Nigerian persons attending my home and contact centres assessing me at the time with my children. We are still awaiting answers. Ombudsman is now looking into my complaints.

My eviction was wrong and unfair. We are now dealing with my complaints against the ‘private sector’ at this time. still ongoing 12/8/2014 with help from my MP Meg Hillier’s surgery.

 

• My children did and do not find social workers or the guardians approachable.  My children’s needs wishes, feelings, were not supported but where suppressed within their reports.  I thought it was the job of the guardian and social workers to provide the courts with accurate words of my children’s wishes and feelings but this was not done. An independent advocate had to be brought in to get my nchildren's true wishes and feelings brought before the court.  Wishes and Feelings by Independent Advocate

• Titi Akinwande also states that I did not show insight into my parenting that I had exposed my children to ‘risk’ and that I do not have the capacity to make changes...

I had ‘no risk assessment’.  I would also like to know what part of my parenting skills did Titi Akinwade sees in my parenting skills.

• Titi also mentioned in her report about my ‘rigidity’ in the mother’s beliefs of our choice in education and the choice I how we lived our life.

 

• Titi said in her report in July 2113 that she does not support the placement having my children returned to my care she dismisses the suggestion of my naturist lifestyle and my fundamental beliefs. Titi as in her reports says that Ms Pow does not see anything wrong with the human naked body.

‘This is a true fact’ I do not. Meaning that my children’s 1st guardian did see the human naked body as wrong.

This was also obvious when they threatened my daughter for saying the word ‘vagina’ we have always taught our children to use the correct words when describing their body.

My daughter was threatened and told to use another word ‘nunny’ or ‘bits’ or ‘pieces’  This is very worrying as this made my daughter speak of shame.

 

• Titi Akinwande also stated in her report that Ms Pow would not be able to bridge the gap in her parenting short fall within the children’s time scale?

I would like to know what the gap in my parenting skills are as Titi did not know me and I did not know her. I only met with this lady on 2/3 occasions.

• Titi also stated that Ms Pow inability to meet my children’s overall needs on a consistent basis?

• Mr Martin Michael’s my children and Titi’s Akinwande’s solicitor reported that they will ensure that her wish to be returned to their mother would be conveyed to the court, but this did not happen.

I also observed Martin Michael’s & Co when sending a very important document to his office.........That this office had not been there for a number of years the head of postal in Ilford said to me face to face.

When I accidently posted my grounds for appeal and not the skeleton argument so I travelled to give Martin Michael & Co but to find there was no office?

 

• An independent advocate was brought in when it was observed that my children’s wishes and feeling were not shown properly within these reports by the social workers or guardians and this is the role of both within their job descriptions.

• Titi refers to a request to have my children give evidence in court specially my son guy whom is Gillick competent to attend the court. Titi Akinwande stated in her report that it would be inappropriate and she questions my motivations? Why does she see my children telling the judge of their wishes and feeling to be inappropriate? It is a right of a child to be listened to, expressing their needs during these proceedings.

I also complain of Ann Haigh my children’s final guardian a few weeks before the final hearing who stated after meeting me for one hour that my children should not be placed in my care without even knowing me or my children. My children both  asked to be returned to their mother. It was also Ann Haigh’ to share with the courts my children’s wishes and feeling but she did not.

Gareth Batley my children’s 3rd Social worker, he said he knew nothing about my case and no information was passed to him by Jean Kanzara. I know Jean got reprimanded at the hearing by the independent reviewing officer Kate Shepherd but we will not see this report. But it was noted by others who attended the meeting.

 

 

I also complained of Gareth Batley the third social worker who just left without passing any information that he was leaving. I left him with very important documents, he left  everyone else bewildered and nobody knowing who was the next social worker.  Gareth I  left very important bank statements with and all my travelling receipts. Who did not pass on any information to the new social worker.

And no one has notified me.

 

 

Not being invited to the LAC review. My family was not notified. Only today by post I got my first leaflet to view before attending it was received on 8th August 2014.

It was not arranged for my children to attend the meeting in the way the IRO hand book states. The meetings have not been arranged for any family to attend which is written in the IRO HANDBOOK that can be downloaded from google.com of the rules that need to be applied.My children’s health was in serious risk with my son putting on well over 2stone in 4months. I made serious continuous complaintand

 

 

no one addressed these serious issues.

My daughter who when taken to the dentist by Denise Williams the first carer when she had a filling. I told the foster carer that my daughter cannot have any metal as she is allergic...... This was not taken seriously as to why today my daughter is having serious issues now with her gums wrotting where some kind of white metal is placed. 

 

I complained of my children drinking pepsi cola first thing in the morning before going to school a serious health issue. Was not taken seriously by the Independent Reviewing Officer.......................................................

 

I complained of my children travelling in cars for many hours without exercise.

 

The social workers or guardian were withholding serious information to my daughter sleep walking during the night crying for her father. My son told me of the trauma that my daughter has been suffering since being forced into care.

I have complained of my telephone contact being cancelled and not being carried out in the appropriate way of law. This was being cancelled in a sinister way by Gareth Batley. It was also he that called and emailed me to take down a posting that I made with the picture of the BAAF document that showed that my children were placed in foster carer till they are 18years of age five months before the final hearing. I have the written proof. He asked to take it down and I did at the time. But now it’s on my site now.

 

 

 

 

Adding the many complaints soon. 1 .   Report Dr Omer Moghraby